Art Garfunkel

Simon__Garfunkel_2

I’ve always felt sorry for Art Gar­funkel because its always felt like he’s got­ten a raw deal from the music world. While Paul Simon has basked in the lime­light for decades, poor Art could prob­a­bly walk down the street and go com­pletely unno­ticed by the major­ity of Amer­i­cans. On fur­ther exam­i­na­tion though you see that he’s lived the typ­i­cal rock star life, with both ups and downs.

He teams up with his friend from child­hood, Paul Simon, and made their first record that went nowhere. So he and Simon broke up, Simon moved to the U.K., and while he was over­seas some sta­tions started play­ing a song, “The Sounds of Silence”, off of their first album, but instead of the way that they’d writ­ten it their pro­ducer took Bob Dylan’s band and over­dubbed it with elec­tric gui­tars. “The Sounds of Silence” went to #1.

So to cap­i­tal­ize on their suc­cess Simon came back to the U.S. and they toured and made a lot of money but it all came crash­ing down when Garfunkel’s solo efforts (Simon also was doing solo mate­r­ial) didn’t chart as high as Simon’s and he started to drop out of the spot­light. That was fol­lowed by more albums that failed to hardly chart and he dropped into fits of depres­sion. Even after team­ing back up with Simon he was mixed out of an album that was sup­posed to be jointly released by the two of them (Simon’s Hearts and Bones) and before long he was scrap­ing for what seemed like Simon’s table scraps.

The worst part about his whole musi­cal career? He never wrote any of the songs he and Paul Simon sang together; he was just a singer, a good one, but not a song­writer. It wasn’t until 2003 that he released his first album of songs that he wrote (Every­thing Waits to Be Noticed).

He’s tried act­ing, poetry and he’s gone through the sui­cides of sev­eral peo­ple close to him. Prob­a­bly in spite of all of what’s hap­pened to him we ought to call him a semi-failed Renais­sance man, albeit a semi-failed Renais­sance man whose made a truck­loads of money.

So Art, after all these years I salute you. You’ve never given up. Keep on truckin’.

George Washington’s Thanksgiving Proclamation

Gilbert_Stuart_Williamstown_Portrait_of_George_Washington

Here it is in its entirety, ver­ba­tim from the original -

Gen­eral Thanks­giv­ing
By the PRESIDENT of the United States Of Amer­ica
A PROCLAMATION

WHEREAS it is the duty of all nations to acknowl­edge the prov­i­dence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grate­ful for His ben­e­fits, and humbly to implore His pro­tec­tion and favour; and Whereas both Houfes of Con­gress have, by their joint com­mit­tee, requefted me “to rec­om­mend to the peo­ple of the United States a DAY OF PUBLICK THANSGIVING and PRAYER, to be observed by acknowl­edg­ing with grate­ful hearts the many and sig­nal favors of Almighty God, espe­cially by afford­ing them an oppor­tu­nity peace­ably to eftablifh a form of gov­ern­ment for their safety and happiness:”

NOW THEREFORE, I do rec­om­mend and affign THURSDAY, the TWENTY-SIXTH DAY of NOVEMBER next, to be devoted by the peo­ple of thefe States to the fer­vice of that great and glo­ri­ous Being who is the benef­i­cent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in ren­der­ing unto Him our fin­cere and hum­ble thanks­for His kind care and pro­tec­tion of the peo­ple of this coun­try pre­vi­ous to their becom­ing a nation; for the fig­nal and man­i­fold mer­cies and the favor­able inter­pofi­tions of His prov­i­dence in the courfe and con­clu­fion of the late war; for the great degree of tran­quil­ity, union, and plenty which we have fince enjoyed;– for the peace­able and ratio­nal man­ner in which we have been enable to eftab­lish Con­fti­tu­tions of gov­ern­ment for our fafety and hap­pinefs, and par­tic­u­larly the national one now lately insti­tuted;– for the civil and reli­gious lib­erty with which we are bleffed, and the means we have of acquir­ing and dif­fuf­ing use­ful knowl­edge;– and, in gen­eral, for all the great and var­i­ous favours which He has been pleafed to con­fer upon us.

And also, that we may then unite in moft humbly offer­ing our prayers and fup­pli­ca­tions to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and befeech Him to par­don our national and other tran­f­gr­ef­fions;– to enable us all, whether in pub­lick or pri­vate fta­tions, to per­form our feveral and rel­a­tive duties prop­erly and punc­tu­ally; to ren­der our National Gov­ern­ment a bleff­ing to all the peo­ple by con­f­tantly being a Gov­ern­ment of wife, juft, and con­fti­tu­tional laws, difcreetly and faith­fully exe­cuted and obeyed; to pro­tect and guide all fov­er­eigns and nations (espe­cially fuch as have shewn kind­nefs unto us); and to blefs them with good gov­ern­ments, peace, and con­cord; to pro­mote the knowl­edge and prac­tice of true reli­gion and virtue, and the increafe of fcience among them and us; and, gen­er­ally to grant unto all mankind fuch a degree of tem­po­ral prof­per­ity as he alone knows to be beft.

GIVEN under my hand, at the city of New-York, the third day of Octo­ber, in the year of our Lord, one thou­sand feven hun­dred and eighty-nine.

(signed) G. Washington

The Blue’s Clues Ability to Skidoo Could Have Astounding Military Applications

blues_clues_wp_1024

On almost every sin­gle episode of Blue’s Clues the human char­ac­ter (either Joe or Steve, or in the UK, Kevin) and the dog Blue “ski­doo” some­where, which is an amaz­ingly sim­ple form of tele­port­ing (trans­port­ing one­self from one place to another instantly), whether onto the sur­face of a globe or into the image on a pic­ture or a com­puter game or into a dio­rama, but it always involves our human pro­tag­o­nist and Blue being trans­ported to some­where else that moments ago they weren’t. It seems that other char­ac­ters on the show can also ski­doo, like Mr. Salt when he needs to go to the gro­cery store.

And ski­doo­ing is an impor­tant plot point to the show, because while on their ski­doo adven­tures the char­ac­ters have learn things and get to play and also may find a Blue’s Clue, whichis  great and all, but you wanna know who else could really use ski­doo­ing, espe­cially in these try­ing eco­nomic times?

The mil­i­tary. Could totally help them out.

One top of all of the bud­get cut­ting that could be done, get­ting rid of trans­port planes/ships that are no longer required, there’s the instan­ta­neous ben­e­fits of such a power. Does the pres­i­dent need to insert a highly skilled team of Navy SEALs into Tehran RIGHT NOW to take out Mah­moud Ahmadine­jad before he does some­thing else crazy? Done! Does South Korea want to finally fin­ish the Korean War once and for all and ski­doo into Pyongyang and take on the entire pop­u­lace of North Korea before they can com­pletely mobi­lize? It’s doable. Any­thing could be doable, as long as we have a pic­ture of where we need to put our mil­i­tary and our boys could remem­ber those easy to recite words — “Blue ski­doo, we can to.” Maybe end it with a “Sir, yes sir,” too.

If Robert Oppen­heimer had been work­ing on a secret ski­doo project instead of the Man­hat­tan Project our boys could have ended WWII early and got­ten to Berlin even before the Russ­ian army was think­ing about mov­ing west­ward from Stal­in­grad and we never would have had to invade North Africa or Italy or oblit­er­ate the Atlantic Wall. And LBJ could have won the Viet­nam War, prob­a­bly, if we’d been able to ski­doo into Hanoi and con­vince Ho Chi Minh that we really did want him to be in favor of democ­racy. He might even have decided to run for reelec­tion and change the course of history.

The major draw­back is that our peo­ple need a pic­ture on the other end of the ski­doo to return the same way. If they lose that picture…well, Mr. Sec­re­tary of Defense, order a new trans­port, since we got rid of them after the bud­get cuts allowed through ski­doo­ing. Enjoy hitch­hik­ing home, soldiers!

But we could get rid of Air Force One, also, just keep that lit­tle blue dog with the Pres­i­dent when­ever he goes on the road.

I think Blue would have to remain non-partisan though. Can’t be favor­ing one polit­i­cal party over another. He’d also have to have a code name.

Any­way, just an idea. A com­pletely cool idea, but just an idea.

George is a Monkey, and He Can Do Things That You Can’t Do. Ever.

curious-george-2-follow-that-monkey-original

My old­est son loves the Curi­ous George show on PBS. He laughs along with it and after­wards will tell me the intri­cate plot points that moved the show from point A to Z. He has his favorites and his not-so-favorites, but gen­er­ally he enjoys all of them, some­what, even if he doesn’t love all of them.

I think Noah likes the show because it reminds him of him­self. George is curi­ous, fairly bright, and always get­ting into sit­u­a­tions that he’d be bet­ter off not get­ting into. He’s smart and funny and cute, just like George, and he prob­a­bly smells bet­ter than George, even though TMWTYH bathes George regularly.

But the show does one thing that, the first time I heard it, I knew imme­di­ately what it meant when I heard it.

In between the two CG seg­ments of the show they will cut to kids tak­ing some les­son that George learned and put it to prac­ti­cal real-world use. Kids will make tele­scopes out of paper towel tubes or trace their shad­ows and watch the sun move and stuff like that, but they always say the same thing after each car­toon seg­ment: “George is a mon­key, and he can do things that you can’t do.”

Really? It’s really come to that? Telling kids that a mon­key might be able to climb up tele­phone poles and swing from power lines with­out being fried to a crisp? Or that he can knock down an entire dinosaur exhibit and put it back together before some sci­en­tists return? What is the mean­ing of this?

If you’re like me you already know what this is — the legal dis­claimer. Yes, George is a mon­key, and he can do things that you can’t do, like get kid­napped from his home­land in Africa and be brought to New York City (wait — some peo­ple a long time ago did do that), or go up in a rocket and repair a satel­lite (that’s been done too), or go ski­ing and res­cue a pig (I’m sure some­one has done those exact same things on a ski trip before).

Get real, PBS. Kids are just as smart and brave and crafty and mis­chie­vous as Curi­ous George, and while the dis­claimer could read “George is a mon­key, and he can do things that you shouldn’t do with­out ask­ing your par­ents first,” all of the things he does are in fact doable, but some lit­tle kid might get hurt or die doing what George does on your show.

When I was a kid there was a park near my house and it had great things to play with there. My favorite thing to do there was swing as high as I could on the swings and then jump off the swing at its high­est point, fly­ing prob­a­bly ten feet or so from a height of about nine to ten feet in the air. It was pretty thrilling to do, and I never broke my arm or ankle, and I could have, but it was fun. And Curi­ous George has fun too, but PBS, don’t tell kids they shouldn’t be adven­tur­ous. That some­times takes all the fun out of being a kid, and if that’s the case you might as well just call him Dullard George.