A Month in Puerto Rico – Part 2 – The First Day

We flew from Dallas to San Juan, which clocked in at around 5 hours. The kids were great on the plane and Peyton slept part of the way there, which made it easier on us, and because of that we also got to relax just a little bit before we hit the ground running.
Our plane left at 1 pm and with the time change to EST we landed at 7 pm. Got our bags (one brand new roller bag now with a broken wheel – thanks AA union thugs for the delicate treatment of our luggage!) and waited for Enterprise to “pick us up”.
We had to wait about 20 minutes, and with the humidity in San Juan it felt as if we waited for about 3 years (I started planning Noah’s 9th and 10th birthday parties during the interim). Enterprise finally showed up, got us to our car and then we pulled out Maggie to get us to the Caribe Hilton.
Maggie is the nickname we gave our GPS when we were in Italy last year. Of the many languages that Maggie could speak we just thought that she sounded better speaking British English (very Helen Mirren) rather than Midwestern American. After we returned from Italy I set it to the American accent but it never sounded as cool. So Maggie has remained British ever since, and, as usual, she got us where we needed to get.
The Caribe Hilton was lovely and the staff was helpful, but by the time we arrived at the hotel it was pretty late and the kids were starving, so we left the Hilton and Maggie guided us to the place we always seem to end up when we go on a trip – McDonald’s.
A note on ordering at McDonald’s – we hadn’t realized how little English would be spoken in Puerto Rico. We had figured that since they are an American protectorate and our military has a presence there that English would be a little more prevalent than we found it. As we soon learned most people at restaurants or service industries didn’t speak English, but hotel people did. Great if you’re staying at a hotel your entire stay, not great if you want a Happy Meal.
So Kim worked her way through ordering at McDonald’s and the kids ate and everyone was happy and slept good that night. The next day was our scheduled day to leave San Juan and get to Vieques, but first we had to go through the town of Fajardo and get to the ferry boat and then take that to Vieques.
The hell that is the Fajardo ferry boat ride next time.
Read more from the Family, Travel category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: Comment. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can Trackback from your site.
A Month in Puerto Rico – Part 1 – Getting There

Kim and I had wanted to take the boys somewhere else pretty cool, much like we did last summer when we vacationed in Italy for a month, and that was an amazing vacation, but this year we were a little more strapped for cash than last year, and trans-Atlantic tickets don’t come cheap. Brainstorming ensued, and we eventually settled on Puerto Rico, and specifically the Puerto Rican islands of Vieques and Culebra. Puerto Rico has a very rich and in some cases, very sad, history, but Christopher Columbus “discovered” it in 1493 and its had its ups and downs ever since. The people are friendly and they use the dollar, which was also a plus.
Vieques and Culebra are both known for their beaches, and since Kim has been pining for a beach-centric vacation for years these places were perfect. Plus the kids could play in the sand and swim in the relatively shallow bays that made up many of the beaches of both islands.
After planning, the vacation broke down, time-wise, like this -
Week 1 – rent house in Vieques
Week 2 – condo on the main island of Puerto Rico, specifically the Loiza area
Week 3 – rent house in Culebra
Upon being told about this trip our parents, remembering how much fun they had with us on our first Italian trip, immediately volunteered to go with us, for the first week of our trip.
I’ll get into that more later on.
We got our airline tickets and started looking for lodging while we were going to stay there. Hotels were pretty much out of the question, mainly because of the price point, but renting a house/condominium was much more attractive, and there were many to choose from. We settled on a nice house that would be able to sleep everyone the first week, a condo our second week and then a house for the four of us our last week. There are a couple of options for travelling to Vieques and Culebra from the main island, but we settled on the cheapest mode of transport – the ferry. $2 per adult and $1 per child for a 1½ hour trip one way. How couldn’t that be great, right?
We got everything packed into 2 duffel bags. All four of us had 5 changes of clothes, except Peyton, who’s been having a lot of peeing accidents lately. Everything else (scuba gear, books, Legos, etc.) plus the clothing stuffed the bags full, but we were under the 50 lb. limit for each.
Flying out was a breeze. Arriving on Vieques was the hard part. More on that next time.
Read more from the Family, Travel category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: Comment. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can Trackback from your site.
The Blue’s Clues Ability to Skidoo Could Have Astounding Military Applications

On almost every single episode of Blue’s Clues the human character (either Joe or Steve, or in the UK, Kevin) and the dog Blue “skidoo” somewhere, which is an amazingly simple form of teleporting (transporting oneself from one place to another instantly), whether onto the surface of a globe or into the image on a picture or a computer game or into a diorama, but it always involves our human protagonist and Blue being transported to somewhere else that moments ago they weren’t. It seems that other characters on the show can also skidoo, like Mr. Salt when he needs to go to the grocery store.
And skidooing is an important plot point to the show, because while on their skidoo adventures the characters have learn things and get to play and also may find a Blue’s Clue, whichis great and all, but you wanna know who else could really use skidooing, especially in these trying economic times?
The military. Could totally help them out.
One top of all of the budget cutting that could be done, getting rid of transport planes/ships that are no longer required, there’s the instantaneous benefits of such a power. Does the president need to insert a highly skilled team of Navy SEALs into Tehran RIGHT NOW to take out Mahmoud Ahmadinejad before he does something else crazy? Done! Does South Korea want to finally finish the Korean War once and for all and skidoo into Pyongyang and take on the entire populace of North Korea before they can completely mobilize? It’s doable. Anything could be doable, as long as we have a picture of where we need to put our military and our boys could remember those easy to recite words — “Blue skidoo, we can to.” Maybe end it with a “Sir, yes sir,” too.
If Robert Oppenheimer had been working on a secret skidoo project instead of the Manhattan Project our boys could have ended WWII early and gotten to Berlin even before the Russian army was thinking about moving westward from Stalingrad and we never would have had to invade North Africa or Italy or obliterate the Atlantic Wall. And LBJ could have won the Vietnam War, probably, if we’d been able to skidoo into Hanoi and convince Ho Chi Minh that we really did want him to be in favor of democracy. He might even have decided to run for reelection and change the course of history.
The major drawback is that our people need a picture on the other end of the skidoo to return the same way. If they lose that picture…well, Mr. Secretary of Defense, order a new transport, since we got rid of them after the budget cuts allowed through skidooing. Enjoy hitchhiking home, soldiers!
But we could get rid of Air Force One, also, just keep that little blue dog with the President whenever he goes on the road.
I think Blue would have to remain non-partisan though. Can’t be favoring one political party over another. He’d also have to have a code name.
Anyway, just an idea. A completely cool idea, but just an idea.
Read more from the Television category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: Comment. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can Trackback from your site.
“George is a Monkey, and He Can Do Things That You Can’t Do.”

My oldest son loves the Curious George show on PBS. He laughs along with it and afterwards will tell me the intricate plot points that moved the show from point A to Z. He has his favorites and his not-so-favorites, but generally he enjoys all of them, somewhat, even if he doesn’t love all of them.
I think Noah likes the show because it reminds him of himself. George is curious, fairly bright, and always getting into situations that he’d be better off not getting into. He’s smart and funny and cute, just like George, and he probably smells better than George, even though TMWTYH bathes George regularly.
But the show does one thing that, the first time I heard it, I knew immediately what it meant when I heard it.
In between the two CG segments of the show they will cut to kids taking some lesson that George learned and put it to practical real-world use. Kids will make telescopes out of paper towel tubes or trace their shadows and watch the sun move and stuff like that, but they always say the same thing after each cartoon segment: “George is a monkey, and he can do things that you can’t do.”
Really? It’s really come to that? Telling kids that a monkey might be able to climb up telephone poles and swing from power lines without being fried to a crisp? Or that he can knock down an entire dinosaur exhibit and put it back together before some scientists return? What is the meaning of this?
If you’re like me you already know what this is — the legal disclaimer. Yes, George is a monkey, and he can do things that you can’t do, like get kidnapped from his homeland in Africa and be brought to New York City (wait — some people a long time ago did do that), or go up in a rocket and repair a satellite (that’s been done too), or go skiing and rescue a pig (I’m sure someone has done those exact same things on a ski trip before).
Get real, PBS. Kids are just as smart and brave and crafty and mischievous as Curious George, and while the disclaimer could read “George is a monkey, and he can do things that you shouldn’t do without asking your parents first,” all of the things he does are in fact doable, but some little kid might get hurt or die doing what George does on your show.
When I was a kid there was a park near my house and it had great things to play with there. My favorite thing to do there was swing as high as I could on the swings and then jump off the swing at its highest point, flying probably ten feet or so from a height of about nine to ten feet in the air. It was pretty thrilling to do, and I never broke my arm or ankle, and I could have, but it was fun. And Curious George has fun too, but PBS, don’t tell kids they shouldn’t be adventurous. That sometimes takes all the fun out of being a kid, and if that’s the case you might as well just call him Dullard George.
Read more from the Television category. If you would like to leave a comment, click here: Comment. or stay up to date with this post via RSS, or you can Trackback from your site.
Elijah McCoy, Lewis Latimer and Granville Woods: African-American Inventors of the 19th Century — A Postscript
I got my paper back from Dr. Sullivan the other night. For some reason, as with everything in this class the past semester, I’ve been a tad nervous when receiving something back that has been graded; it’s just a thing with me, I don’t know why I’m apprehensive about it. And when I got my paper back I saw at the top the grade — a 75. Wow. C+. Awesome…for real.
No, it wasn’t awesome. It was kinda sucky.
But then I remembered that Dr. Sullivan has kind of a screwy grading scheme, 100 isn’t always the top score that you can get, so I asked someone, “What was the top score you could get on this paper?” And they replied, “Seventy-five.”
So I got an A+, a 100%, or as I said, “a perfect,” and it only took about two weeks and some furious editing.
And he said -
Excellent paper. I like the way you presented the three inventors in the context of a broader picture of invention — and its influence within the African-American experience.
And I feel good about the paper. Very good.

