Bioarchaeology

In Florida there’s a guy named Tom Robin­son, and he’s freak­ing related to Genghis Khan. Well, maybe he is.

Or so says some out­fit out of Eng­land called Oxford Ances­tors. They’re a firm that is pio­neer­ing a bur­geon­ing field called “bioar­chae­ol­ogy”. It all sounds very sus­pect, espe­cially given what Oxford Uni­ver­sity geneti­cist Bryan Sykes, the founder of Oxford Ances­tors says.

Oxford Ances­tors, founded in 2001, offers DNA test­ing to peo­ple who want to test their genetic lineage.

Sykes believes that humanity’s com­mon ances­try can be traced through DNA. In 1994, he linked a woman in Britain and a frozen 5,000-year-old corpse found in the Tyrolean Alps, all through their com­mon DNA.

From the AP -

Sykes’ 2001 book “The Seven Daugh­ters of Eve” claimed that 95 per­cent of Euro­peans are descended from seven tribal matri­archs — he dubbed them Ursula, Xenia, Helena, Velda, Tara, Katrine and Jas­mine — who lived between 10,000 and 45,000 years ago. He also believes most Euro­peans can trace their descent to “Five Sons of Adam,” and offers tests to iden­tify these pater­nal ances­tral clans by map­ping pat­terns of DNA within the Y chro­mo­some, the genetic mate­r­ial handed down from fathers to sons that changes lit­tle over generations.

Pub­lished in an arti­cle in the Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Human Genet­ics in 2003, research sug­gested that 16 to 17 mil­lion men, most in Cen­tral Asia, shared a form of the Y chro­mo­some that indi­cates a com­mon ancestor.

Sykes says that the obvi­ous can­di­date for this is Genghis Khan, who con­quered almost all of Asia and fathered many chil­dren in the process. Of course, there isn’t any actual tis­sue from the Mon­gol ruler — whose tomb has never been found — the tests are based on an assess­ment of probabilities.

This is cir­cum­stan­tial evi­dence but it is very good evi­dence,” said Sykes. “I think it does mean that peo­ple who carry this chro­mo­some are direct patri­lin­eal descen­dants of Genghis Khan.” How this chro­mo­some came to be so promi­nent was that when he con­quered new ter­ri­tory Genghis Khan would kill the men and rou­tinely insem­i­nate all the women.”

Now, this totally sounds like BS. But what I found fun­nier than the expla­na­tion about how this man was related to Khan was his response in find­ing out he was related to the con­queror. Again, from the AP -

My first impres­sion was, ‘Oh no, who is it?’ imag­in­ing it was Adolf Hitler or some­thing like that,” said Robin­son, 48. “So I was actu­ally pleas­antly surprised.”

Now, I know Adolph Hitler was respon­si­ble for the deaths of mil­lions, but Khan wasn’t much bet­ter. He took over the Asi­atic con­ti­nent, and, accord­ing to Jack Weath­er­ford, author of “Genghis Khan and the Mak­ing of the Mod­ern World“, the death toll esti­mate caused by Khan was roughly 15 mil­lion peo­ple over 5 years of conquest.

26. March 2007 by Glenn Vance
Categories: Science | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *

*