Richard Corliss and Why the Blockbusters Were the Best Films This Year

ironman

In last week’s issue of Time mag­a­zine their film critic Richard Corliss wrote a rather lengthy arti­cle on why he thought that all of the best movies this year were block­busters. Some of his favorites from the past year were Iron Man, Speed Racer, WALL-E and The Dark Knight, and while I agree with two of his choices, Speed Racer didn’t appeal to me (so I didn’t see it) and, hate me if you will, and if you loved it you prob­a­bly will, but I didn’t care about see­ing WALL-E. At all. I’m a big fan of the Pixar pic­tures, but WALL-E just didn’t inter­est me.

But I have to agree with Corliss on his sec­ondary point; being the end of the year this is the time for awards-caliber films, and this year is look­ing pretty lame. Early on I was inter­ested in see­ing Gran Torino but then my inter­est fiz­zled out for no per­cep­ti­ble rea­son even though I love Clint East­wood. The Reader sounds so bor­ing and Slum­dog Mil­lion­aire deals with under-aged pros­ti­tu­tion so they’re out in my book.

But Corliss doesn’t bring up the biggest glar­ing omis­sion that he made about the two films that we do agree on. The Dark Knight was directed by Christo­pher Nolan who did the fan­tas­tic Memento1 sev­eral years back and John Favreau directed Iron Man. Favreau started out in indie films (Swingers, Mrs. Parker and the Vicious Cir­cle) and then moved on to direct­ing (Will Ferrell’s sec­ond most under­rated per­for­mance — Elf2 ) Indie direc­tors tend to focus more on story and plot than, say, Michael Bay or that dufus McG3 because their bud­gets are usu­ally in the high hundred-thousands or the low mil­lions. What’s been great about Nolan’s and Favreau’s careers is that they so far have kept the indie ethic of sto­ry­telling first and just tack­ing on the spe­cial effects to aide the visuals.

I doubt Iron Man or The Dark Knight will get nom­i­nated for the big awards, other than Heath Ledger, but the were enjoy­able and inter­est­ing films that deserved the crit­i­cal acco­lades, and the piles of money, that they earned.

  1. And the awe­some The Pres­tige. []
  2. Most under­rated? Stranger Than Fic­tion. []
  3. Why doesn’t he just use his real name — Joseph McGinty? []

22. January 2009 by Glenn Vance
Categories: Movies | 1 comment

Paul vs. John: Who’s the Better Songwriter?

beatles

I first heard the Bea­t­les way back when I was a Boy Scout. Our scout­mas­ter had brought some tapes on the cam­pout and he played them in the car as went back and forth to the camp­site and I have to admit that at the time I thought they were just…okay. But, much like This is Spinal Tap, with repeated hear­ings they got bet­ter and more inter­est­ing. I don’t remem­ber now what those first tapes were, prob­a­bly “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” and “The White Album”, but I don’t know. Maybe it was those, maybe not. Since then though I think that “Revolver” is prob­a­bly their best, and as with most every­thing, every­one has their own opin­ion about the band.

Every­one who’s any­one, on first hear­ing, just knows that John is the bet­ter song­writer.1 He was much cooler than Paul since Paul had gone on to be in that lame band Wings. Then Paul did “Ebony and Ivory”, which imme­di­ately dis­qual­i­fied him in the cool cat­e­gory. Paul was the pretty one that all of the girls loved while John was the rebel and res­i­dent weirdo. Who would have thought to have a bag in for peace? John. Would Paul have thought about hav­ing a bag in for peace? No of course not, because Paul was the good one.

So time passes and I see the film Imag­ine, star­ring the rebel him­self, and you come away with only one thought: Man, John was a jerk. And not just a small-time jerk. His jerkios­ity could have caused an eclipse. Or sank the Titanic. Or crushed the Third Reich. At one point there is a fan hang­ing around out­side of John’s home, so John goes out to the gate and talks to the guy. He is less than friendly and actu­ally insults the man sev­eral times.

John was a tool. But that shouldn’t dis­count his abil­ity to write cool songs. “The Bal­lad of John and Yoko”? Genius.

And now when I lis­ten to the Bea­t­les albums2 I hear the songs that Paul sang and how their much more…singable…than John’s songs. “Eleanor Rigby”, “For No One”, “Let it Be”, Paul is the win­ner on my score­card. John’s got some great ones to his credit, and Paul did sing “Back in the USSR”, which I think is ter­ri­ble and knocks Paul down a few notches, but the same album has “Hap­pi­ness is a Warm Gun” and “Everybody’s Got Some­thing to Hide Except for Me and My Mon­key”, which are awe­some. But they don’t make John the win­ner. John wrote some very strange songs, which I’m sure some peo­ple like, but for me, the wal­rus is Paul.

  1. And every­body was cooler than Ringo. []
  2. And I own and have heard all of them. Least favorite? “Yel­low Sub­ma­rine” []

20. January 2009 by Glenn Vance
Categories: Music | Leave a comment

The Old Man Is Almost Back…

It’s been a long time since I wrote here, but some­thing is going to hap­pen tonight that sadly will be the begin­ning of the end for the best show on tele­vi­sion today (sorry, “Lost”). The reimag­ined “Bat­tlestar Galac­tica” fires up for the sec­ond half of sea­son four and I couldn’t be more psy­ched about it.

We last saw our band of pil­grims as they arrived at Earth, but not the Earth that we cur­rently know. It’s a bombed-out radioactive-looking waste­land that doesn’t look very wel­com­ing to the voy­agers from the twelve colonies. I would guess we’ll get our ques­tions answered this sea­son, at least I hope we do. Bat­tlin’ Bill Adama has brought these peo­ple this far, I doubt that he’ll leave them hang­ing, but what about hope at this point? Most of what was keep­ing every­one going onboard those fly­ing tin cans was the hope that Earth would be out there, some­where, and that it would be hab­it­able. It’s like get­ting half of a prayer answered. Sure, you made it to Earth, but are you going to like it once you get there? Good luck. Brother Cavil is still out there with his com­pa­tri­ots, and when they find Earth…eek.

We’ll also finally get to see the last secret Cylon. I guess after Baltar’s aborted Cylon Detec­tor didn’t fig­ure out that four of the Final Five weren’t human that some­one we know and love will be the last one. I’m hop­ing that it’s not one of the top two (Adama or Pres­i­dent Roslin), and I don’t think that the cre­ators of the show would take so obvi­ous a tack. My gut tells me that it could be Tom Zarek, but who knows. It would also be a com­plete mind f*ck if it was Billy Keikeya, who died in a bar­room shootout, or Ellen Tigh, who was killed by her hus­band back on New Caprica.

And is Lee Adama still the pres­i­dent now that Roslin is back? Does she even want to be pres­i­dent any­more? If Lee is still pres­i­dent, will Zarek keep try­ing to influ­ence him(another rea­son that I think he is a top con­tender for The Last One)?

My only com­plaint? That the Sci-Fi net­work sur­vives off of peo­ple watch­ing this one show, and because of that they aired the first ten episodes of sea­son four and then had the audac­ity to hold onto the final 10 until 7 MONTHS LATER. Shame on you, Sci-Fi Chan­nel. At least you’re finally going to air them.

And I’ve waited so long for this show to come back on. Please lord let it be good. No, be bet­ter than good, please be great and remind me why I love this show so much. Please.

Back to Top ↑

16. January 2009 by Glenn Vance
Categories: Television | Leave a comment

Why I Would be a Super Villain

Galactus

I love Bat­man. Always have. Always will.

I sucked it up and watched all but one of the 80’s/90’s Bat­man movies Bat­man & Robin. (Why any­one would look at that and think it was good is just crazy) and used to col­lect the comic books off and on, watched the crummy 60’s TV show in reruns when I was a kid, so don’t even try and not call me a Bat­man lover. Not in a Batman/Robin…you know…well…not-that-there’s-anything-wrong-with-that kind of way, but I’ve always enjoyed Bat­man. Bruce Wayne went from wimpy kid one minute to crazed future vig­i­lante in the next with the death of his par­ents. He donned the cape, the mask, he became what crim­i­nals would fear, and he ruled, which was the best part.

Superman…yeah, he’s alright, but Bat­man was a nor­mal per­son wail­ing on some­body. You could feel your blood pump and the adren­a­line go up as he started in on, as the Fan­tas­tic Four’s Thing would say, “clob­berin’ time.”

Bat­man never really cared much about the con­se­quences of his actions like Super­man did. Clark was always the fine upstand­ing man that he was raised to be and was sup­posed to be. He was good and kind and saw the world in black and white. But the world has never been black and white, sure there are good guys and bad guys, but some­times the bad guys are on your side fight­ing for your inter­ests The CIA in the 80’s try­ing to get rid of the com­mu­nist San­danistas in Cen­tral Amer­ica, for instance and some­times they’re not. Al Queda Some­times they’re out for world dom­i­na­tion and other times they just want money or power or some­thing that makes them look sexy in the eyes of oth­ers. And it’s those rea­sons that would make me want to be a super vil­lain. But not just your nor­mal run-of-the-mill vanilla super vil­lain. No sir. I’m look­ing to be unique, if possible.

Good guys always have to look out for the inno­cent bystanders and are racked with guilt if they cause an inno­cent life to be extin­guished in the process of sav­ing oth­ers. Look at the fight between Spi­der­man and Green Gob­lin towards the end of the first Spi­der­man movie I’ve read that Warner Bros, the stu­dio that puts out the Super­man films, is think­ing of tak­ing a hint from the Cristo­pher Nolan lead Bat­man films and that they might reboot the Super­man series in a darker light. What are they think­ing? Super­man is sunny, Bat­man is dark. Is Super­man not going to care what he does? He’s the son of Kryp­ton sent to Earth to be this planet’s pro­tec­tor, not some gray-area hero.

Which is why it would be cool to be a supervil­lain. You just wouldn’t have to care. Your whole rea­son for liv­ing is to gain street cred, or cash, or babes, or some­thing intan­gi­ble that makes up for that hor­rific time in your life that made you that evil bas­tard that you became. And it would be fun because tak­ing out your aggres­sion is fun, even if it’s a plane­load of peo­ple you’ve never met before, sure, one of them did some­thing that they deserve a huge pound­ing for. Heat vision to the wing of the plane, that’s the way to do it.

I’d drive a cool car and live in some fore­bod­ing super-fortress in the Himalayas and have a legion of war­riors at my beck and call and have min­ions, evil min­ions, that would do what­ever I com­manded. They’d prob­a­bly be nin­jas. Or some rogue para­mil­i­tary out­fit that I have on my pay­roll. I’d be friends with dic­ta­tors and inter­na­tional crim­i­nals and I’d nat­u­rally flaunt it in pub­lic, because what’s the fun in being a supervil­lain if you can’t rub it in the face of the peo­ple that you call your mor­tal enemies?

And I’d have to be best friends with my mor­tal enemy too, just like Mag­neto and Charles Xavier. I don’t know any­body who is bald and needs a wheel chair, but I’m evil. I’ll put some­one in a wheel­chair and then shave his head or some­thing. And after I’ve been caught and put in some fool­proof prison where only the hard­est of the hard vil­lains reside and my best friend comes and vis­its me we’ll rem­i­nis­cence about the old days and I’ll make allu­sions like I’m plan­ning to escape and he’ll threaten me in veiled terms and we’ll glare at each other and then we’ll laugh as I block his king with my knight in the game of chess we’ve been play­ing and I breathily whis­per, “Checkmate.”

Now that’s a heck of a career right there.

Back to Top ↑

30. October 2008 by Glenn Vance
Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

← Older posts

Newer posts →